It used to be that “a week was a long time in politics”, but these days, major developments seem to occur daily. It's no surprise then that November 2018 already seems like a very long time ago. But that's how long Amber Rudd MP has been in post as Cabinet Secretary for the Department of Work and Pensions (DWP).For years, UK Government Ministers have been doggedly committed to the Universal Credit. They've pursued it without regard for the serious concerns from recipients and organisations like Engender. Expectations that a new Minister at the DWP would change track now were low, despite her assertion that she was ready to listen and "learn from errors".
However last month the DWP announced some high profile changes to the way Universal Credit (UC) works and is being implemented. Those changes were welcomed by the Minister for Women and Equalities Penny Mordaunt MP as ‘supporting women’s economic empowerment’. Here we take a closer look to see if this claim adds up and assess what impact these changes may have on women’s incomes and gender equality:
The single household payment is one of Engender’s biggest concerns about Universal Credit. Alongside our colleagues in the women’s and equalities sectors, we have consistently argued that it is regressive, re-enforces outdated ideas about male breadwinners and female care-givers, and is a direct risk for women experiencing domestic abuse. Instead, we believe that payments should be automatically split to ensure each partner has their independent income which addresses their individual needs. The House of Commons Work and Pensions Committee agrees and the Scottish Government has committed to introducing split payments by default in Scotland. However, Amber Rudd has ruled out the same move in England and Wales and instead announced that the whole payment will be paid to the ‘main carer’ in the household. This will of course change nothing for couples with no children. Additionally there’s no clarity on whether this means that there’s a technical change to ensure the true main carer is identified.
Managed migration is the transfer of people from older benefit systems like Job-seekers' Allowance to Universal Credit. This process will be ‘paused’ until a pilot of 10,000 people can be carried out. This isn’t quite a new announcement, as rumours had been swirling under the previous Minister, Ester McVey MP. Nonetheless, it is a welcome one, given the persistent design issues with Universal Credit. However Rudd also says there will be "will be no overall delay" to the migration of the 3 million people who continue to receive legacy benefits. They will still be migrated from a system they have relied on for many years onto one still fraught with issues. Many of those issues disproportionately affect women; especially work conditionality for parents and incentives for second earners.
Three weeks before the two-child limit, or ‘family cap’, on Universal Credit claims was due to be extended, the Work and Pensions Secretary announced that applying the cap retroactively would be unfair. This will be a great relief for families that would have seen their incomes reduced by the policy being applied retroactively, but the fact remains that the cap continues to curtail women’s reproductive freedoms. Disappointingly, Rudd has also said nothing about an end to the ‘rape-clause’. As we've stated repeatedly in both written briefings and oral evidence to Scottish Parliament, the 'rape-clause' is cruel, re-traumatising and violates international standards of human rights.
With payment amounts frozen for the past four years, an end to the freeze will be much welcomed. Given that women are more likely to rely on social security, this will impact women’s budgets for the better. However, the freeze was already due to end in spring 2020, so Rudd’s ‘announcement’ actually means that nothing has changed. With rising household costs, another year of static resources means even more women and their families will be pushed into poverty.
You can find more information on why Universal Credit is an issue for women's equality and why gender matters in social security on our Gender Matters Roadmap wesbite here, and sign up to our social security mailing list here to stay up-to-date with our work on these issues.
‘Knowing Me; Knowing You: Is this the best we can do for cohabiting couples? Engender has responded to the Scottish Law Commission's consultation on reforms to the law governing cohabitation in Scotland. This blog, from Engender's Policy and Parliamentary Manager Eilidh Dickson, sets out why equality in cohabitation is a feminist issue.
We are always looking for new voices on our blog.
Please send us your blogs and we can offer editing advice, and we also have some opportunities for paid contributions.